Figures here come from third-party laboratory tests, each one cited. We earn no commission from any link on this site. How we're funded
The method

How we rate power stations

The page the rest of the site rests on. If you only read one thing here, read this — it tells you what our numbers are and, more importantly, what they are not.

Updated 5 September 2026

What this site is, and what it is not

Solar Power Auditor does not currently own, operate or bench-test the products it writes about. We want to say that at the top rather than bury it, because a lot of sites in this category imply hands-on testing they have not done.

What we do instead is narrow and, we think, useful: portable power stations are sold on a rated capacity printed on the box, and they deliver noticeably less than that at the AC outlet. Independent laboratories measure the gap. Manufacturers rarely publish it. We collect those published measurements, put them beside the manufacturer's own figures, and show you both — with a link to whoever did the measuring.

◆ The
Rated capacity is a marketing number. Usable capacity is the one that keeps your fridge cold. Across the units on this site the gap runs from 7% to 25%, which is the difference between a unit that lasts the night and one that does not.

Where the measurements come from

Every measured figure on this site is attributed inline and listed again in a Sources block at the foot of the page. The figure carries a superscript number; the number is the source.

We use three kinds of information, and we never blur them together:

KindWhat it isHow we mark it
Independent measurementA named lab or publication ran the unit and published a numberCited, with the publication named in the text
Manufacturer specificationA figure from the maker's own spec sheetDescribed as a claim, and attributed to the maker
Our arithmeticA runtime or cost we calculated from the two aboveLabelled "calculated", with the working shown

The bulk of the measured capacity data here comes from OutdoorGearLab, which publishes both its results and its procedure, and from StorageReview, which publishes instrumented measurements for some units. Where a unit has never been independently measured, we say so and we do not score it on capacity.

The five-part score

Every scored unit gets one weighted score out of ten, built from the same five criteria in the same proportions. The score box on each review prints the full sum, so you can check our arithmetic.

CriterionWeightWhat it rests on
Usable capacity & output 30% Independently measured watt-hours delivered at the AC outlet, as a share of the rated figure, plus continuous and surge output.
Recharge & solar input 20% Independently timed AC recharge, plus the published solar input ceiling and whether the unit passes power through while charging.
Build, ports & durability 20% Cell chemistry, rated cycle life and the capacity it is rated to, port mix, warranty length, and certification.
Portability & noise 15% Independently measured weight and carry design. Noise is included only where a dBA figure is published, and is labelled as a manufacturer claim where no independent measurement exists.
Value per usable Wh 15% List price divided by independently measured usable watt-hours — not by the rated figure.

The weights are deliberate. Usable capacity and output carries 30% because it is the thing most often misrepresented and the thing that decides whether the unit does its job. Value is only 15% because the cheapest unit per watt-hour is frequently the wrong unit for the use case.

◇ Why
The design this site is built on originally weighted Noise & thermals at 15%. We changed that criterion to Portability & noise for one reason: almost nobody publishes independently measured dBA for this category. Manufacturers publish noise claims; we report them as claims. Weight, by contrast, is independently measured and matters enormously for a box you carry. We score what there is evidence for.

The arithmetic we show

Runtimes on this site are calculated, not observed. We take an independently measured usable capacity and divide it by a stated load. Those assumptions are fixed across every page so the comparisons stay honest:

AssumptionValueWhy
12 V camp fridge45 W running averageTypical compressor fridge, cycling
Household fridge150 W at 35% dutyFull-size unit, so 52.5 W average
CPAP35 WHumidifier off — with it on, roughly double
Solar panel pair2 × 100 W nominalThe common starter configuration
Panel derate75% of nominalReal output in clear conditions, allowing for angle, temperature and controller loss

So a unit measured at 890 Wh usable runs the camp fridge for 890 ÷ 45 = 19.8 hours, and we print 19 h 47. Solar recharge divides the rated capacity by the effective panel input, capped by the unit's own solar ceiling — a unit that only accepts 220 W cannot use 2 × 100 W panels any faster than 150 W of real input allows.

These are estimates with the working shown, not measurements. Your fridge, your sun and your cable losses will differ.

⚠ Our
The 75% panel derate above is a common planning figure. The one independent panel measurement we have found — a Jackery SolarSaga 100 W tested in full sun — recorded a peak average of 50.7 W, closer to 51%.[1] We have not re-based every figure on one test of one panel on one day, but we are not going to hide it either: real solar recharge will often be slower than the figures this site publishes. For a conservative plan, assume 50–60% of nominal. If more independent panel measurements appear, we will change the assumption and note it here. More detail in solar recharge in practice.

What we deliberately do not publish

  • Street prices. They move weekly and we do not have a price feed. We publish the manufacturer's list price with the date we checked it, and nothing else.
  • Noise figures we cannot source. If no independent dBA measurement exists, we either quote the manufacturer's claim as a claim, or leave the field empty.
  • Runtime for unmeasured units. If nobody has measured a unit's usable capacity, we do not calculate what it will run. We mark it as unmeasured.
  • Scores for units nobody has measured. They appear in spec tables but not in rankings.

Corrections

If a figure here is wrong, we want to fix it and say that we did. Every page carries a modified date, and material corrections are noted on the page itself rather than silently edited. Tell us what we got wrong.

What changes when we start testing

We intend to run our own bench. When we do, measured figures will be labelled as ours, the procedure will be published here in enough detail to be repeated, and third-party figures will stay on the page alongside them rather than being replaced. Until that happens, everything here is somebody else's measurement and our arithmetic — which is exactly why we cite it.

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these
  1. OutdoorGearLab. Jackery SolarSaga 100 W panel — measured output. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026