Buy a power station and you buy a number. 1,024 watt-hours. 2,042 watt-hours. It is on the case, in the product title, and in every advertisement.
You will not get that number. You will get somewhere between 75% and 93% of it, depending on the unit and how hard you push it.[1][2] Nobody prints the second figure on the box.
Where the missing energy goes
Three things take a share, in roughly this order of size.
The inverter. Your battery stores direct current. Your appliances want alternating current at 120 V. Converting between them costs energy, mostly as heat — which is why the fan runs. A good inverter in its efficient band gives back around 90%; a cheap one, or one running far below its rated output, gives back considerably less.
The reserve. Lithium iron phosphate cells are damaged by being fully emptied. Every manufacturer therefore holds back a slice at the bottom and calls the pack "empty" before it truly is. You never see this energy and you would not want to.
Self-consumption. The screen, the controller, the Bluetooth radio and the cooling fan all draw power while the unit is on. Over a long, slow discharge this adds up — and proportionally it hurts small loads far more than large ones.
What the measurements actually show
These are independently measured figures, taken by OutdoorGearLab under one consistent method — roughly 80% of each unit's rated maximum output, discharged to cutoff.[4]
| Unit | Rated | Usable | Fridge run | Solar in | Output | Weight | List |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 Best measured efficiency | 4096 Wh | 3790 · 92.5% | 84 h 13 | 2600 W | 4000 W | 114.1 lb | $3,699 |
| Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Best measured value | 1024 Wh | 890 · 86.9% | 19 h 47 | 600 W | 2000 W | 25.2 lb | $499.99 |
| Bluetti Elite 100 V2 Most solar input | 1024 Wh | 890 · 86.9% | 19 h 47 | 1000 W | 1800 W | 25.3 lb | $899 |
| EcoFlow Delta 3 Fastest recharge | 1024 Wh | 870 · 85% | 19 h 20 | 500 W | 1800 W | 28.1 lb | $699 |
| Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 Lightest per Wh | 1070 Wh | 910 · 85% | 20 h 13 | 400 W | 1500 W | 24.4 lb | $559 |
| Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 Best 2 kWh carry | 2042 Wh | 1710 · 83.7% | 38 h 00 | 400 W | 2200 W | 38.9 lb | $999 |
| EcoFlow River 2 Pro | 768 Wh | 620 · 80.7% | 13 h 47 | 220 W | 800 W | 18.4 lb | $529 |
| Anker SOLIX C300 Smallest | 288 Wh | 230 · 79.9% | 5 h 07 | 100 W | 300 W | 9.1 lb | $329.99 |
Swipe for 4 more columns →
- Rated
- 4096 Wh
- Usable
- 3790 · 92.5%
- Fridge run
- 84 h 13
- Solar in
- 2600 W
- Output
- 4000 W
- Weight
- 114.1 lb
- List
- $3,699
- Rated
- 1024 Wh
- Usable
- 890 · 86.9%
- Fridge run
- 19 h 47
- Solar in
- 600 W
- Output
- 2000 W
- Weight
- 25.2 lb
- List
- $499.99
- Rated
- 1024 Wh
- Usable
- 890 · 86.9%
- Fridge run
- 19 h 47
- Solar in
- 1000 W
- Output
- 1800 W
- Weight
- 25.3 lb
- List
- $899
- Rated
- 1024 Wh
- Usable
- 870 · 85%
- Fridge run
- 19 h 20
- Solar in
- 500 W
- Output
- 1800 W
- Weight
- 28.1 lb
- List
- $699
- Rated
- 1070 Wh
- Usable
- 910 · 85%
- Fridge run
- 20 h 13
- Solar in
- 400 W
- Output
- 1500 W
- Weight
- 24.4 lb
- List
- $559
- Rated
- 2042 Wh
- Usable
- 1710 · 83.7%
- Fridge run
- 38 h 00
- Solar in
- 400 W
- Output
- 2200 W
- Weight
- 38.9 lb
- List
- $999
- Rated
- 768 Wh
- Usable
- 620 · 80.7%
- Fridge run
- 13 h 47
- Solar in
- 220 W
- Output
- 800 W
- Weight
- 18.4 lb
- List
- $529
- Rated
- 288 Wh
- Usable
- 230 · 79.9%
- Fridge run
- 5 h 07
- Solar in
- 100 W
- Output
- 300 W
- Weight
- 9.1 lb
- List
- $329.99
Two patterns are worth pulling out of that table.
Bigger units keep more. The 4,096 Wh EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 returned 93%; the 288 Wh Anker SOLIX C300 returned 80%.[5][6] The inverter's fixed overhead is the same either way, so it is a much smaller share of a big pack. If you are choosing between one large unit and two small ones, this is a real argument for the large one.
Same rating, different delivery. The Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2, Bluetti Elite 100 V2 and EcoFlow Delta 3 are all rated 1,024 Wh. They delivered 890, 890 and 870 Wh.[7][8][9] Twenty watt-hours is not much — but the rating gave you no way at all to know which was which.
Working out your real number
If a unit has been independently measured, use the measured figure. If it has not, the honest approach is to assume the middle of the range and accept that you are estimating:
Usable watt-hours ≈ rated watt-hours × 0.85
Then divide by your load to get hours. A 1,024 Wh unit becomes roughly 870 Wh, which runs a 45 W camp fridge for about 19 hours.
Two adjustments matter:
- Small loads: if you are drawing under about 50 W, use 0.80 rather than 0.85. Self-consumption is punishing at that end.
- Old packs: a battery rated to 80% capacity after 4,000 cycles will, eventually, hold 80%. If you are sizing for a system you intend to keep a decade, size against the end-of-life figure, not the new one.
The claim that is not about capacity
Rated-versus-real is not confined to capacity. Recharge times are claimed too, and they are also measurable.
The clearest case on this site is the Jackery Explorer 2000 v2, which claims a 1 hour 45 minute recharge and was independently timed at 2 hours 30 — a 43% overrun.[10][11] The EcoFlow Delta Pro 3's peak charge rate was measured at about 1,600 W against an advertised 1,800 W.[5]
Others hold up well. The Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 was measured at 56 minutes against a 49-minute UltraFast claim, and the Jackery Explorer 1000 v2's measured 1 h 35 matched its own specification.[7][12]
Why the number is not on the box
There is no requirement to publish it, no standard method that would make published figures comparable, and a strong commercial reason not to. A manufacturer that honestly advertised "1,024 Wh rated, about 890 Wh usable" would sit on a shelf beside a competitor advertising "1,024 Wh" and look worse while being identical.
This is a coordination problem rather than a conspiracy, and it is exactly the sort of thing independent measurement is for.
FAQ
What percentage of a power station's capacity is actually usable?
Between 75% and 93% based on independent testing, with most units in the 84–87% band. Larger units generally do better than small ones, and any given unit does better under a moderate load than a very light one.[1][2]
Is a higher usable percentage always better?
As a measure of engineering quality, broadly yes. But it is not the only thing that matters, and it says nothing about output, durability or price. A unit returning 85% of a large rating still gives you more energy than one returning 90% of a small one.
Does usable capacity change as the battery ages?
Yes. Manufacturers rate cycle life to a retention figure — most commonly "4,000 cycles to 80%", meaning the pack should still hold 80% of its original capacity after 4,000 full cycles. Watch that percentage: some units are rated to 80% and some only to 70%, and a 70% rating is a materially weaker promise for the same headline cycle count.[13][14]
Why do two reviews of the same unit report different usable capacities?
Almost always because they used different loads. A heavier draw within the inverter's efficient band yields a higher percentage than a very light one. This is why we do not rank units across laboratories — see how we rate.
Should I buy one big unit or two small ones?
For total usable energy, one big one, on efficiency grounds alone. Two small units also mean two inverters idling and two lots of self-consumption. The argument for two is redundancy and portability, not capacity.
Next: how to size a power station turns your actual appliances into a watt-hour number, and the full ranking applies all of this to ten units.
Sources
- OutdoorGearLab. The Best Power Stations of 2026 — Lab Tested & Ranked. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- Consumer Reports. Best Portable Power Stations of 2026, Lab-Tested and Reviewed. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- Techreviewer. Bluetti Elite 100 V2 test — capacity measured at several load levels. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. How We Tested Power Stations. Independent lab methodology · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. Anker SOLIX C300 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. Bluetti Elite 100 V2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. EcoFlow Delta 3 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- Jackery. Explorer 2000 v2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
- OutdoorGearLab. Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
- Jackery. Explorer 1000 v2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
- Bluetti. Elite 100 V2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026