Figures here come from third-party laboratory tests, each one cited. We earn no commission from any link on this site. How we're funded
Guide · the core idea

Rated vs Usable Capacity — Why Your Power Station Gives Back Less Than the Box Says

This is the single most useful thing to understand before buying a power station, and almost nobody selling one will tell you about it.

Updated 5 September 2026 6 min read Third-party test data

Buy a power station and you buy a number. 1,024 watt-hours. 2,042 watt-hours. It is on the case, in the product title, and in every advertisement.

You will not get that number. You will get somewhere between 75% and 93% of it, depending on the unit and how hard you push it.[1][2] Nobody prints the second figure on the box.

◆ The
Rated capacity measures energy stored in the cells, at DC. You use energy at the AC socket. Between the two sits an inverter, a protective reserve, and the unit's own running costs. What survives is the usable capacity, and it is the only number that tells you how long your fridge stays cold.

Where the missing energy goes

Three things take a share, in roughly this order of size.

The inverter. Your battery stores direct current. Your appliances want alternating current at 120 V. Converting between them costs energy, mostly as heat — which is why the fan runs. A good inverter in its efficient band gives back around 90%; a cheap one, or one running far below its rated output, gives back considerably less.

The reserve. Lithium iron phosphate cells are damaged by being fully emptied. Every manufacturer therefore holds back a slice at the bottom and calls the pack "empty" before it truly is. You never see this energy and you would not want to.

Self-consumption. The screen, the controller, the Bluetooth radio and the cooling fan all draw power while the unit is on. Over a long, slow discharge this adds up — and proportionally it hurts small loads far more than large ones.

◇ Why
This is the part that confuses people, and it is why two laboratories can measure the same unit and disagree. Draw 500 W and the inverter runs near its efficient band while self-consumption is a small share of the total. Draw 20 W and the inverter is running badly while the unit's own electronics eat a meaningful fraction of everything you take out. One test of the Bluetti Elite 100 V2 recorded about 93% usable at a constant 500 W load and roughly 80% at very low double-digit loads — from the same unit.[3]

What the measurements actually show

These are independently measured figures, taken by OutdoorGearLab under one consistent method — roughly 80% of each unit's rated maximum output, discharged to cutoff.[4]

Rated against measured usable capacity
UnitRatedUsableFridge runSolar inOutputWeightList
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 Best measured efficiency4096 Wh3790 · 92.5%84 h 132600 W4000 W114.1 lb$3,699
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Best measured value1024 Wh890 · 86.9%19 h 47600 W2000 W25.2 lb$499.99
Bluetti Elite 100 V2 Most solar input1024 Wh890 · 86.9%19 h 471000 W1800 W25.3 lb$899
EcoFlow Delta 3 Fastest recharge1024 Wh870 · 85%19 h 20500 W1800 W28.1 lb$699
Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 Lightest per Wh1070 Wh910 · 85%20 h 13400 W1500 W24.4 lb$559
Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 Best 2 kWh carry2042 Wh1710 · 83.7%38 h 00400 W2200 W38.9 lb$999
EcoFlow River 2 Pro768 Wh620 · 80.7%13 h 47220 W800 W18.4 lb$529
Anker SOLIX C300 Smallest288 Wh230 · 79.9%5 h 07100 W300 W9.1 lb$329.99

Swipe for 4 more columns →

EcoFlow Delta Pro 3Best measured efficiency
Rated
4096 Wh
Usable
3790 · 92.5%
Fridge run
84 h 13
Solar in
2600 W
Output
4000 W
Weight
114.1 lb
List
$3,699
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2Best measured value
Rated
1024 Wh
Usable
890 · 86.9%
Fridge run
19 h 47
Solar in
600 W
Output
2000 W
Weight
25.2 lb
List
$499.99
Bluetti Elite 100 V2Most solar input
Rated
1024 Wh
Usable
890 · 86.9%
Fridge run
19 h 47
Solar in
1000 W
Output
1800 W
Weight
25.3 lb
List
$899
EcoFlow Delta 3Fastest recharge
Rated
1024 Wh
Usable
870 · 85%
Fridge run
19 h 20
Solar in
500 W
Output
1800 W
Weight
28.1 lb
List
$699
Jackery Explorer 1000 v2Lightest per Wh
Rated
1070 Wh
Usable
910 · 85%
Fridge run
20 h 13
Solar in
400 W
Output
1500 W
Weight
24.4 lb
List
$559
Jackery Explorer 2000 v2Best 2 kWh carry
Rated
2042 Wh
Usable
1710 · 83.7%
Fridge run
38 h 00
Solar in
400 W
Output
2200 W
Weight
38.9 lb
List
$999
EcoFlow River 2 Pro
Rated
768 Wh
Usable
620 · 80.7%
Fridge run
13 h 47
Solar in
220 W
Output
800 W
Weight
18.4 lb
List
$529
Anker SOLIX C300Smallest
Rated
288 Wh
Usable
230 · 79.9%
Fridge run
5 h 07
Solar in
100 W
Output
300 W
Weight
9.1 lb
List
$329.99

Two patterns are worth pulling out of that table.

Bigger units keep more. The 4,096 Wh EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 returned 93%; the 288 Wh Anker SOLIX C300 returned 80%.[5][6] The inverter's fixed overhead is the same either way, so it is a much smaller share of a big pack. If you are choosing between one large unit and two small ones, this is a real argument for the large one.

Same rating, different delivery. The Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2, Bluetti Elite 100 V2 and EcoFlow Delta 3 are all rated 1,024 Wh. They delivered 890, 890 and 870 Wh.[7][8][9] Twenty watt-hours is not much — but the rating gave you no way at all to know which was which.

93% Best measured
75% Worst measured
84–87% Typical

Working out your real number

If a unit has been independently measured, use the measured figure. If it has not, the honest approach is to assume the middle of the range and accept that you are estimating:

Usable watt-hours ≈ rated watt-hours × 0.85

Then divide by your load to get hours. A 1,024 Wh unit becomes roughly 870 Wh, which runs a 45 W camp fridge for about 19 hours.

Two adjustments matter:

  • Small loads: if you are drawing under about 50 W, use 0.80 rather than 0.85. Self-consumption is punishing at that end.
  • Old packs: a battery rated to 80% capacity after 4,000 cycles will, eventually, hold 80%. If you are sizing for a system you intend to keep a decade, size against the end-of-life figure, not the new one.
⚠ Do
If your calculation says you need 900 usable watt-hours, do not buy a unit that measures 910. Cold weather, an ageing pack, a fridge that cycles harder than you assumed and a load you forgot will all eat the margin. Size up by a class.

The claim that is not about capacity

Rated-versus-real is not confined to capacity. Recharge times are claimed too, and they are also measurable.

The clearest case on this site is the Jackery Explorer 2000 v2, which claims a 1 hour 45 minute recharge and was independently timed at 2 hours 30 — a 43% overrun.[10][11] The EcoFlow Delta Pro 3's peak charge rate was measured at about 1,600 W against an advertised 1,800 W.[5]

Others hold up well. The Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 was measured at 56 minutes against a 49-minute UltraFast claim, and the Jackery Explorer 1000 v2's measured 1 h 35 matched its own specification.[7][12]

Why the number is not on the box

There is no requirement to publish it, no standard method that would make published figures comparable, and a strong commercial reason not to. A manufacturer that honestly advertised "1,024 Wh rated, about 890 Wh usable" would sit on a shelf beside a competitor advertising "1,024 Wh" and look worse while being identical.

This is a coordination problem rather than a conspiracy, and it is exactly the sort of thing independent measurement is for.

⚠ Be
Searching for these figures turns up many sites publishing precise-looking usable capacities with no named tester, no equipment and no method — and several claiming efficiencies above 95%, which is not physically plausible through an AC inverter. Where two such sites cover the same unit they routinely contradict each other. Check that a number names the laboratory that produced it. Every figure on this page does.

FAQ

What percentage of a power station's capacity is actually usable?

Between 75% and 93% based on independent testing, with most units in the 84–87% band. Larger units generally do better than small ones, and any given unit does better under a moderate load than a very light one.[1][2]

Is a higher usable percentage always better?

As a measure of engineering quality, broadly yes. But it is not the only thing that matters, and it says nothing about output, durability or price. A unit returning 85% of a large rating still gives you more energy than one returning 90% of a small one.

Does usable capacity change as the battery ages?

Yes. Manufacturers rate cycle life to a retention figure — most commonly "4,000 cycles to 80%", meaning the pack should still hold 80% of its original capacity after 4,000 full cycles. Watch that percentage: some units are rated to 80% and some only to 70%, and a 70% rating is a materially weaker promise for the same headline cycle count.[13][14]

Why do two reviews of the same unit report different usable capacities?

Almost always because they used different loads. A heavier draw within the inverter's efficient band yields a higher percentage than a very light one. This is why we do not rank units across laboratories — see how we rate.

Should I buy one big unit or two small ones?

For total usable energy, one big one, on efficiency grounds alone. Two small units also mean two inverters idling and two lots of self-consumption. The argument for two is redundancy and portability, not capacity.

Next: how to size a power station turns your actual appliances into a watt-hour number, and the full ranking applies all of this to ten units.

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these
  1. OutdoorGearLab. The Best Power Stations of 2026 — Lab Tested & Ranked. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  2. Consumer Reports. Best Portable Power Stations of 2026, Lab-Tested and Reviewed. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  3. Techreviewer. Bluetti Elite 100 V2 test — capacity measured at several load levels. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  4. OutdoorGearLab. How We Tested Power Stations. Independent lab methodology · accessed 5 September 2026
  5. OutdoorGearLab. EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  6. OutdoorGearLab. Anker SOLIX C300 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  7. OutdoorGearLab. Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  8. OutdoorGearLab. Bluetti Elite 100 V2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  9. OutdoorGearLab. EcoFlow Delta 3 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  10. OutdoorGearLab. Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  11. Jackery. Explorer 2000 v2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
  12. OutdoorGearLab. Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  13. Jackery. Explorer 1000 v2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
  14. Bluetti. Elite 100 V2 — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
SPA
The Solar Power Auditor desk

We do not run our own bench. We collect published laboratory measurements from independent testers, put them beside the manufacturer figures, and show the arithmetic behind every runtime we quote. Where nobody has measured something, we say so rather than estimating it.

How this site works →