Figures here come from third-party laboratory tests, each one cited. We earn no commission from any link on this site. How we're funded
Head to head · one measured, one not

EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 vs Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus — Measurement Against Specification

This comparison is unusual, because one of these units has been through a laboratory and the other has not. That asymmetry matters more than any specification on either sheet.

Updated 5 September 2026 6 min read Third-party test data
◆ Short answer
On paper the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus wins comfortably: 6,000 W continuous against 4,000 W, 9,000 W surge against 8,000 W, and $1,300 cheaper.[1] We still recommend the EcoFlow Delta Pro 3, because it is the only one of the two that any independent laboratory has measured — 3,790 Wh usable, 93% of its rating, the best efficiency recorded on this site.[2] If you are comfortable buying a specification sheet, the Anker is very likely the better hardware.
Product buttons go to Amazon listings. We are not in any affiliate programme, so we earn nothing whether you buy or not. Full policy

The asymmetry

Normally a comparison sets two measured units against each other. This one cannot.

The EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 was discharged on a load bank by OutdoorGearLab, which published the result and its method.[2][3]

The Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus has, as far as we can establish, never been independently measured. The most substantial hands-on review of it states explicitly that it is "a practical assessment rather than a controlled lab test".[4]

◆ What
Every number in the Anker's column below is Anker's own. Every number in the EcoFlow's usable-capacity row was produced by someone with no commercial interest in the answer. Those are different kinds of claim, and this site exists because the difference matters.

We are not saying the Anker underperforms. We have no evidence either way — which is the point.

Side by side

EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 against Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
SpecificationEcoFlow Delta Pro 3Anker SOLIX F3800 PlusSource of the figure
Rated capacity4,096 Wh3,840 WhBoth manufacturers
Measured usable3,790 Wh · 93%Not measuredLab / none
AC continuous4,000 W6,000 WBoth manufacturers
Surge8,000 W9,000 WBoth manufacturers
120/240 V split-phaseYesYesBoth manufacturers
Max solar input2,600 W1,600 or 3,200 WAnker states both
Cycles4,000 to 80%3,000 to 80%Both manufacturers
Weight114.1 lb measured132.3 or 136.7 lbLab / Anker states both
Expansion12 kWh unit, 48 kWh system26.9 kWh per unitBoth manufacturers
Warranty5 years5 yearsBoth manufacturers
Price$3,699$2,400Both manufacturers
Rated capacity
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
4,096 Wh
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
3,840 Wh
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Measured usable
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
3,790 Wh · 93%
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
Not measured
Source of the figure
Lab / none
AC continuous
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
4,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
6,000 W
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Surge
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
8,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
9,000 W
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
120/240 V split-phase
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
Yes
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
Yes
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Max solar input
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
2,600 W
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
1,600 or 3,200 W
Source of the figure
Anker states both
Cycles
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
4,000 to 80%
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
3,000 to 80%
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Weight
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
114.1 lb measured
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
132.3 or 136.7 lb
Source of the figure
Lab / Anker states both
Expansion
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
12 kWh unit, 48 kWh system
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
26.9 kWh per unit
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Warranty
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
5 years
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
5 years
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers
Price
EcoFlow Delta Pro 3
$3,699
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
$2,400
Source of the figure
Both manufacturers

Read the right-hand column. It is the most informative part of the table.

Where the Anker genuinely leads

None of this is in dispute, and it is substantial.

6,000 W continuous at 120 V and 240 V from a single box, against the EcoFlow's 4,000 W.[1] That is a real capability gap. A well pump, an HVAC blower and a 240 V dryer running at once is plausible on the Anker and not on the EcoFlow.

9,000 W surge, against 8,000 W.[1]

$1,300 cheaper. Anker cut the F3800 Plus's list price permanently from $4,799 to $2,499 in May 2026, and lists it at $2,399.99 today.[5][1]

Expansion to 26.9 kWh per unit, with two units pairing for 12,000 W.[1]

If those specifications hold, the Anker is the better home-backup unit and it is not close.

Where the EcoFlow leads

It has been measured. 3,790 usable watt-hours from a 4,096 Wh rating — 93%, the highest efficiency of any unit on this site.[2]

That figure is worth putting in context. If the Anker converts at the category-typical 85%, its 3,840 Wh rating yields about 3,264 usable watt-hours — 526 fewer than the EcoFlow, despite the two units' ratings being within 7% of each other. If it converts at 93% like the EcoFlow, it yields 3,571.

⚠ That
Ten hours of refrigeration hangs on a number that does not exist in public. On a $2,400 purchase, that seems like something a buyer should be able to find out.

4,000 cycles against 3,000, both to 80%.[6][1] A third more rated life.

2,600 W of solar input, stated once. Which brings us to the other problem.

Anker's page contradicts itself, twice

This is not a minor documentation quibble, because both figures are load-bearing for a purchasing decision.

Weight. The specification table says 132.3 lb. The visible specification panel on the same page says 136.7 lb.[1]

Solar input. The specification table says 1,600 W. The marketing copy on the same page says "up to 3,200 W" — apparently two ports at 1,600 W each.[1]

A factor-of-two discrepancy in solar input is the difference between a one-day and a two-day recharge from an array. It is the specification most likely to determine whether this unit suits an off-grid installation, and Anker publishes both answers on one page.

The verdict is about risk, not hardware

We want to be precise about what we are and are not claiming.

We are not saying the F3800 Plus is a bad unit. Anker has a good record, the specification is genuinely impressive, the price is aggressive, and the hands-on coverage that exists is broadly positive.[4]

We are saying that on a site whose entire premise is that rated numbers overstate real ones by 7% to 25%, recommending an unmeasured unit over a measured one would be incoherent. The gap between rating and reality is exactly the thing we cannot assume away.

FAQ

Is the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus better than the EcoFlow Delta Pro 3?

On published specifications, yes — more output, more surge, more expansion, $1,300 cheaper. But no independent laboratory has measured its real usable capacity, and Anker's own page gives contradictory weight and solar figures.[1] We recommend the EcoFlow because its performance has been verified independently.

How much usable capacity does the F3800 Plus have?

Nobody outside Anker knows. At the category-typical 85% its 3,840 Wh rating would give about 3,264 usable watt-hours; at the EcoFlow's measured 93% it would give about 3,571. That 300 Wh uncertainty is unresolved.

Do both output 240 V?

Yes. Both provide native 120 V and 240 V split-phase, which is what a well pump, an electric dryer or a central air handler needs.[6][1] The Anker does it at 6,000 W against the EcoFlow's 4,000 W.

Which lasts longer?

The EcoFlow on the published ratings — 4,000 cycles to 80% capacity against the Anker's 3,000, both to the same 80%.[6][1] That is roughly a third more rated life.

Should I wait for the Anker to be tested?

If you can, yes. If you need the 6,000 W split-phase output specifically, the EcoFlow cannot provide it and the Anker is your option — in which case you are buying the specification, which is a legitimate choice as long as you know that is what you are doing.

Signed verdict SPA · 2026-09-05

Buy the measured one, unless you need 6,000 watts

The EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 is our recommendation because it is the only one of these two whose real performance is known: 3,790 usable watt-hours, 93% of its rating, the best efficiency measured on this site. It also has a third more rated cycle life.

The Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus is probably the better hardware and is certainly better value on paper. If you need 6,000 W of split-phase output, or the EcoFlow's price is simply out of reach, buy it — with clear eyes about the fact that its usable capacity is an open question and its own specification sheet contradicts itself on weight and solar input.

If somebody publishes a proper measurement of the F3800 Plus, this recommendation may well change. That is how it should work.

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these
  1. Anker SOLIX. SOLIX F3800 Plus — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
  2. OutdoorGearLab. EcoFlow Delta Pro 3 Review. Independent lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  3. OutdoorGearLab. How We Tested Power Stations. Independent lab methodology · accessed 5 September 2026
  4. AppleInsider. Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus review — a practical assessment, not a controlled lab test. Hands-on review, not a lab test · accessed 5 September 2026
  5. 9to5Toys. Anker expands SOLIX sale — F3800 Plus price history. Price reporting · accessed 5 September 2026
  6. EcoFlow. DELTA Pro 3 Portable Power Station — specifications. Manufacturer spec · accessed 5 September 2026
SPA
The Solar Power Auditor desk

We do not run our own bench. We collect published laboratory measurements from independent testers, put them beside the manufacturer figures, and show the arithmetic behind every runtime we quote. Where nobody has measured something, we say so rather than estimating it.

How this site works →